By Angelique Gurley, Corporate Communications Student Journalist, Kadan Esson, Corporate Communications Assistant
The School of Education and Humanities at The University of the Southern Caribbean (USC) recently hosted the highly anticipated Dr. Shirley A. McGarrell’s. Future Leaders Debate Competition 2024, featuring a spirited intellectual exchange between two of USC’s leading schools: the School of Education and Humanities and the School of Science, Technology, and Allied Health.
This year’s debate tackled the timely resolution: “Be it resolved that the potential of artificial intelligence to augment human relationships should be embraced.” The competition highlighted the exceptional talent, research, and strategic argumentation of USC students as they explored the complex relationship between artificial intelligence (AI) and human connections.
The Debate
Two teams of passionate debaters took to the stage to present compelling arguments for and against the resolution:
- The School of Science, Technology and Allied Health:
Represented by Marc Alleyne, Natalya Morris, and Jerleema Frampton (Miss USC), the team argued in favor of embracing AI as a tool to augment human relationships. They emphasized AI’s potential to protect vulnerable populations, such as children, through technologies like chatbots that can simulate human interactions and intercept harmful online behavior. Their stance framed AI as a responsible and supportive force that enhances, rather than replaces, human empathy.
- The School of Education and Humanities:
Represented by Aqeisha Ackool, Ketaryah Taitt, and Ruqayya Abdul Haqq (Portrait of Excellence 2025 delegate). The team cautioned against unregulated AI development, pointing to risks such as job displacement, ethical misuse, and diminished socialization. They highlighted real-world cases of AI manipulation and warned of the technology’s potential to harm vulnerable groups. Their arguments underscored the need for regulation and a measured approach to integrating AI into human relationships.
Key Highlights and Insights
The debate showcased a balanced exploration of AI’s potential and challenges. Marc Alleyne clarified the distinction between AI and robotics, explaining that AI enhances human experiences by automating specific tasks. Meanwhile, Aqeisha Ackool highlighted the dangers of technologies like deepfakes and their potential misuse in creating explicit or manipulative content.
Both teams demonstrated thoughtful engagement with the topic, offering nuanced perspectives on AI’s societal impact.
The Judging Panel
The competition was evaluated by a distinguished panel of judges:
- Senator Dr. Paul Richards: Provided insights on presentation, body language, and clarity.
- Ms. Chantal La Roche: Acting Clerk of the Senate, assessed arguments from a legal and procedural standpoint.
- Mrs. Petronetta Pierre-Robertson: chief adjudicator, Managing Editor of the Caribbean Curriculum Journal, brought her expertise in academic research and education to the evaluation process.
Awards and Results
After intense deliberation, the results were announced:
- Best Teamwork: School of Education and Humanities
- Best Research: Marc Alleyne
- Best Debater: Aqeisha Ackool
- Debate Winner: The School of Education and Humanities
A Resounding Success
The Future Leaders Debate Competition 2024 was a testament to the intellectual depth and passion of USC students. The event sparked critical dialogue on the ethical and social implications of AI, emphasizing the importance of balancing technological innovation with human values.
While the School of Education and Humanities emerged as the winners, both teams showcased exceptional research and argumentation, leaving the audience with much to reflect on as AI continues to shape our world.
This debate serves as a reminder of the role of academic institutions in fostering critical thinking and preparing future leaders to navigate the complexities of technology and society.
